“I want to make one thing perfectly clear today,” Ruffalo said. “A stand-alone Hulk movie will never happen because Universal has the rights to the stand-alone Hulk movie and, for some reason, they don’t know how to play well with Marvel. And clearly they don’t like money. But I feel like I have two or three years before I’m too old to play the Hulk.
“We’ve talked about it and I just don’t see it in the cards.”
Mark Ruffalo confirms he’ll never be in a stand-alone Hulk movie, calls out Universal
Comments (16)
Leave a comment
Join the conversation
A free account lets you comment, like comments, and get an alert when someone replies to you.
-
NO one wants a Hulk movie, he’s not a good enough character
0 likes-
I wouldn’t go that far. I just don’t think that, after working out the rights financially, there’s any profit in it.
0 likes -
I don’t think Hulk translates well to the big screen
0 likes
-
-
What?! No way!
0 likes -
And cast Ed Norton to confuse people even more.
2 likes-
That would be a huge “Fuck you” to Marvel Studios. And I think Norton would love to do it too.
1 like
-
-
Shame. Aside from Spidey he’s my favorite Avenger. Loved The Incredible Hulk.
0 likes -
Actually Marvel have the rights back – to make it, but Universal still have distribution rights. Meaning that Marvel have to give first rights to distribute to Universal (making them a heap of free money & losing Marvel a heap).
2 likes-
A confusing situation. Doesn’t surprise me that Ruffalo would be confused as well.
1 like
-
-
I don’t recall those first two Hulk movies setting any records for Universal Mark. Get over yourself.
5 likes-
This uh… this is true…
1 like -
Which is why they should give him back over to Marvel. No point in keeping him if you’re not going to use him.
0 likes-
If Disney wanted the rights to this character they would provide Universal with an offer they couldn’t refuse. The financial reality is Incredible Hulk barely outgrossed Hulk. There’s no money in a solo film.
1 like-
And after they pay for the rights how much money do they make off the movie?
That and this silly little tidbit: Lowest grossing Marvel Cinematic Universe film by a large margin. Put any spin you want on it, that’s the truth.
Besides, they seem more interested in “team up” movies for established characters now anyway.
0 likes -
There was no money for it in 2008. Ever since the first Avengers, Hulk has always been an audience favorite. In a post Avengers superhero movie age where something like Guardians has made huge bank, I don’t see any reality where a new solo Hulk film makes less than $700 million. Based off of how Thor Ragnarok does I’m almost willing to bet Universal and Marvel will start talking.
0 likes
-
-
-
-
Universals Ego is too big after that year they scored big with Fast 6 and Jurassic Park
3 likes
